|
|
| |||||||
May 13, 2010600 HZ Sub-field Drive for Plasma HDTV ExplainedBefore discussing what a plasma display 600Hz sub-field drive is it’s necessary to point out that it is not the same thing as the 120Hz and 240Hz frame rates mentioned in LCD HDTV advertising literature. While the 120Hz and 240Hz are a direct measure of the frame rate per second the 600Hz figure for sub-field drives is not.
Unlike LCD displays which have backlighting, plasma display pixels generate their own illumination within a box like cell structure. Because they can only maintain illumination for milliseconds pixels/cells have to be pulsed rapidly to maintain the illusion of continuous illumination. The advantage high speed sub-field drives is higher pulse rate which can be achieved while maintaining panel/picture brightness. For a 600Hz sub-field drive (Panasonic and Samsung) pixels are pulsed 10 times while each frame is shown. As the frame rate is 60Hz (frames per second) there are 600 pulses per second which is a frequency of 600Hz. ![]() Full 1080 Lines of Motion ResolutionMarketing for 600Hz sub-field drive plasma HDTVs refers to their ability to display a full 1080 lines of resolution. This statement is inferring that, unlike other (LCD), displays 600Hz sub-field drive plasma display can clearly display 1080 lines of motion resolution. Displaying 1080 lines of static resolution is a far easier achievement than clearly displaying 1080 lines of motion resolution (resolution while displaying on-screen motion). Below is a graphic showing the effect of on-screen motion on resolution. ![]() Motion resolution is not mentioned in marketing documents and it is a point of contention that a test developed to measure it, the http://www.advanced-pdp.jp/news/e_01.html Moving Picture Resolution Measurement System (APDC method), was developed by the Advanced PDP Development Center Corporation which is funded by two plasma HDTV manufacturers, Hitachi and Panasonic. A Hi-Definition Reference Disc by Qtec containing the text pattern for motion resolution testing (and much more ) is available. Despite the contention about the measurement of motion resolution it is well established that plasma displays handle on-screen motion far better than LCD displays. 0 Comments »No comments so far. RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Please add your comments to the post topic |
1080p vs 720p or Full HD vs HD Native 24p Playback vs 3:2 Pulldown Timeline for 3D Without Glasses Tips for Longer Lasting Projector Lamps
How Digital Light Processing (DLP) Works
Passive Polarisation vs Active Shutter 3D In Plane Switching (IPS) vs Twisted Nematic (TN) LCD 120Hz 240Hz and 240Hz Effect LCD Anti Blur Technologies Compared Advantages of LED over Conventional LCD Backlighting Lens Shift vs Digital Keystone Correction |
||||||
| |||||||